In the past Venice was thought of as one of the most roman­tic cities in the world, these days it seems that the romance is fad­ing and adver­tis­ing is tak­ing its place. Today the Venet­ian author­i­ties are doing restora­tion work on the Doge’s Palace and the Pri­gioni Nove, and to get fund­ing they have sold scaf­fold­ing to cloth­ing com­pany Sis­ley. The Bridge of Sighs has all but dis­ap­peared. This type of ‘cul­tural spon­sor­ship’ where com­pa­nies pay for their brand to be vis­i­ble in promi­nent loca­tions and
the money goes towards restor­ing the cul­tural mon­u­ments, seems to be hap­pen­ing all over Europe
and opin­ion is divided.

sisley1

Pre­vi­ously Venice didn’t have bill­boards inside the city, and shops had mod­est sig­nage and lim­ited adver­tis­ing. The bar­rier was lifted last year when a piece of mar­ble fell from a build­ing onto a Ger­man tourist. This year fears of law­suits were renewed when a piece of mar­ble fell from the Cor­rer into
the piazza.

Nor­mally when pub­lic build­ings in Venice are under­go­ing restora­tion behind scaf­fold­ing, they would be cov­ered with life­size ren­di­tions of the same build­ings facade. Venice is falling apart and has the costly issue of restora­tion. The offi­cial Venet­ian posi­tion is a plea of des­per­a­tion. Tourism is down, Fed­eral sub­si­daries are down and the build­ings are falling down. Their solu­tion is to sell the adver­tis­ing rights
to the facades being restored.

Recently we have seen a H&M cam­paign on the Palais de Jus­tice in Paris and a Veo­lia cam­paign on
a promi­nent tower in Prague, now Venice has a Sis­ley cam­paign on the Bridge of Sighs. Sis­ley, the sophis­ti­cated and edgy brand of the Benet­ton Group, con­tin­ues to offer inspi­ra­tional col­lec­tions aligned with the avante-garde trends of today. With cloth­ing avail­able in over 120 coun­tries it has become one
of the lead­ing brands of cloth­ing in the world. The indis­putable fac­tor for the suc­cess of the brand through­out the world is its adver­tis­ing campaigns.

sisley2

sisley3

Sisley’s lat­est cam­paign is plas­tered over the bridge and adja­cent build­ings declar­ing Il Cielo dei Sospiri — The Sky of the Sighs. Is this inspired method of com­mu­ni­cat­ing a brand’s mes­sage ruin­ing the cities cul­tural beauty? The Bridge of Sighs is one of the most famous scenes of the city. It is renowned world­wide for being one of the great exam­ples of bridge archi­tec­ture, a must-see for tourists. These days tourists strug­gle to see the bridge and sur­round­ing archi­tec­ture, and they are in uproar. How can we con­demn the Venet­ian author­i­ties for going to any length to keep its cities archi­tec­tural trea­sures alive? Even if the spon­sor­ing brands have their own self-serving agen­das. Either way the con­tro­versy over the way the city is main­tain­ing its her­itage will continue.

Cas­san­dra Gill, Design Director.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Cultural sponsorship or merely advertising?”

  1. Tim says:

    I kinda like the idea of ‘cul­tural spon­sor­ship’ for restora­tion work. Mak­ing money while spend­ing money, it’s a means to an end.

  2. Emma says:

    Great blog Cass, I think it should be a very short term solu­tion to restor­ing this beau­ti­ful city. Some places really do need to be sacred — this turns me off the brand completely.

  3. Reg says:

    Cassie, think there has to be mid­dle ground. Cul­tural spon­sor­ship should aspire to have some win win dimen­sions, and who wants a slab of mar­ble on their head. Not a good look!

  4. Paolo says:

    Great arti­cle guys, this is exactly what the book ‘No Logo’ was about. Whilst I’m def­i­nitely not anti-brand, I really don’t like it when brands step over the line into space that I feel should be left unbranded. Brands that don’t have a sense of those bound­aries of appro­pri­ate­ness can end-up dis­en­fran­chis­ing cus­tomers like me.

  5. Emma says:

    Recently in Venice, I was a lit­tle dis­ap­pointed to see the Bridge of Sighs cov­ered by the Sis­ley cam­paign. If this kind of adver­tis­ing funds the restora­tion of the his­tor­i­cal struc­tures they are dis­played on, then I think it I have to be in favour of them. My only worry is the amount of time the build­ing is cov­ered. These images change the feel­ing of the place. When I was look­ing at the Bridge of Sighs I couldn’t con­nect with mean­ing of the struc­ture like I could when I was stand­ing on the bridge (between the palace and the prison) look­ing out through the bridge’s small windows.

  6. Chris says:

    There is def­i­nitely a fine line here and I don’t think Venice has it right. I think the ad com­pa­nies need to do their bit as well. This for me gen­er­ates a neg­a­tive reac­tion to the Sis­ley brand.

  7. dominic says:

    Cass, a very well writ­ten blog and after read­ing all the com­ments it seems that most agree with you. I cer­tainly do! I haven’t had the oppor­tu­nity to visit Venice ‘yet’ but have been to Rome and was there when a lot of restora­tion was going on. I was a lit­tle dis­ap­pointed in the scaf­fold­ing being so preva­lent but at least it was for the right cause, this being restora­tion. I would hate to think what the Colos­seum or Roman Forum would’ve looked like cladded with gigan­tic brand messages.

Leave a Reply