Mel­bourne has the hype of the Grand Prix this week­end, when petrol heads from around the coun­try descend on our fair town for some thrills and spills. The event is a highly sub­sidised mar­ket­ing pro­gram designed to build the pro­file of Mel­bourne inter­na­tion­ally and, along the way, inject some dol­lars into the local econ­omy. There is always heated debate about the mer­its of host­ing this event. The sug­gested cumu­la­tive $622m cost to tax pay­ers since the cir­cus began in the mid 90’s in Mel­bourne means that the event rep­re­sents a huge ‘oppor­tu­nity cost’ to the com­mu­ni­ties of Vic­to­ria what ever way you cut it.


But the cost to stage the Grand Prix is really a dis­cus­sion for another time. Instead let’s explore the chal­lenges asso­ci­ated with cre­at­ing on-brand expe­ri­ences when it comes to spon­sor­ship. In the last few days we have just wit­nessed the unveil­ing of new out­fits for the ‘grid girls’. Impor­tantly from a brand per­spec­tive we have seen how spon­sor Qan­tas has had a shot at mak­ing the some­what raunchy pres­ence of grid girls into an accept­able adver­tis­ing medium for their brand. An inter­est­ing chal­lenge, but one clearly under­stood by designer Kit Wil­low who designed the new uniforms:

”Qan­tas … wanted style and ele­gance for the grid girls,” she said. ”But, then, there’s the grand prix,
and, um, I had to keep sym­pa­thy with, um, its tra­di­tion of, um, well OK, tits and arse. That was
the challenge.’’

The ques­tion is has Kit and Qan­tas suc­ceeded in main­tain­ing the tra­di­tion of the grid girls but also pro­vided an on-brand can­vass on which to broad­cast the Qan­tas brand. Cer­tainly some media com­ments sug­gest they have fallen short. In fact one fash­ion com­men­ta­tor called it a polit­i­cally cor­rect step in the wrong direc­tion. Another using a pun about the run­way to give it the thumbs down….’but when it really comes down to it, high fash­ion looks are best left to the run­way, not the highway.’

You be the judge as to whether you like the Kit Wil­low design, but from a brand per­spec­tive it is a great reminder of the need to align your spon­sor­ships with activ­i­ties that pos­i­tively con­nect with your brand. The more you have to force-fit the activ­ity to suit your brand sug­gests that per­haps you are explor­ing the wrong oppor­tu­ni­ties. But hav­ing said that it is the very fact that Qan­tas has to work at mak­ing the grid girls an accept­able brand expres­sion that has given it some potency. The mere fact that they have shifted the grid girl out­fits away from the bare-it all for­mat has said some­thing pos­i­tive about how the Qan­tas brand views the world. If they had sim­ply stuck their logo on the tra­di­tional attire of the grid girls,  they would have been out of whack with their con­ser­v­a­tive cor­po­rate posi­tion­ing. The re-design it self has already gen­er­ated huge media expo­sure with its unveil­ing, and all that is before race day where their logo will be strut­ting the grid for world wide audi­ences to see. Hate or love the new designs per­haps this is one force-fit spon­sor­ship that deliv­ers accept­able returns to the brand.

Hav­ing said all that, please let me leave you with this thought, imag­ine the re-design if Vir­gin Blue had been the spon­sor. If you are pic­tur­ing a totally dif­fer­ent image then you are prob­a­bly under­stand­ing the dif­fer­ent per­son­al­i­ties of these com­pet­ing brands… in fact wouldn’t it be inter­est­ing to observe a Richard Bran­son led design of the grid girl’s out­fits. I am sure there would be a cho­rus of approval from our petrol head audience.

Peter Singline
Brand Scientist

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Qantas in Hot Pants – Melbourne F1 Grand Prix”

  1. david says:

    Pete, I agree, the fact that Qan­tas have changed to look of the grid girls is the bold part of this brand ges­ture. For me they scored dou­ble points for this brand spon­sor­ship; firstly for the impact they get from rev­o­lu­tion­is­ing an insti­tu­tion, sec­ondly by mak­ing it such an on-brand revoltion, they re-inforce both their brand posi­tion­ing and rein­force their com­pet­i­tive point of dif­fer­ence in the marketplace.

  2. LTJ says:

    Gang­ster like hats, sheer ver­sion of early Vic­to­rian top with the qan­tas sign look­ing like a brooch, shorts & shoes out of a cheap bondage mail order. There is too much hap­pen­ing and clash­ing. Could that be the intention?

  3. gf says:

    who­ever selected wil­low should know bet­ter because the out­come was almost sur­ley going to be her sig­na­ture hall­mark of floaty/draping and fem­i­nine and not what I would call syn­ergy with the grand prix or Quan­tas. The girls look like look dark and frumpy. Strong & chic with an ele­ment of sharp­ness about it may have been a bet­ter approach this is just messy.

  4. Anthony Butler says:

    Shorts that look like they were made out of Hefty Bags?

    There’s noth­ing worse than going for a trashy look-and missing!

Leave a Reply