All Food is not Born Equal
We are cur­rently work­ing with food pro­duc­ers around the Cairns region in Aus­tralia (Trop­i­cal North Queens­land) to develop a propo­si­tion for their regional food brand. The region is a great reminder of the magic of nature. It is such an incred­i­bly lush and fer­tile region with diverse eco-systems giv­ing birth to an amaz­ing array of fresh healthy food. A true Gar­den of Eden.

Great Fly­ing Pig Photo: uk_serendipity (Flickr)

Wit­ness­ing the purity of a lot of their pro­duce made me reflect on the grow­ing desire by con­sumers to under­stand where their foods come from, and impor­tantly how they were grown. Hence the grow­ing con­sump­tion of organ­ics. Such a sim­ple require­ment really, some hon­est pack­ag­ing or point of sale signs com­mu­ni­cat­ing the true ori­gins of the food. But as a coun­try we con­tinue to strug­gle with this require­ment and some less than rep­utable food pro­duc­ers and retail­ers are very happy to exploit the soft reg­u­lat­ing of food claims.

Even big retail brands, with rep­u­ta­tions and brand equity wor­thy of the utmost respect appear guilty of stretch­ing the truth. Take the recent exam­ple of David Jones telling a few ‘porkies’ about their free range pork. The pork they had on sale was labeled free range when in fact the pork they were sell­ing is known as ‘bred free-range’….getting con­fused? You should be because most con­sumers are. The term ‘bred free range’ actu­ally means the pigs can access out­side areas for the first 25 days after birth and then housed inside and unable to range for the 16–18 weeks before slaughter.

What is a sim­ple def­i­n­i­tion tech­ni­cal­ity between pigs you ask? Good ques­tion. It cer­tainly is not per­ceived as a prob­lem by DJ’s.  A media state­ment from them said…’As there is no law or stan­dard gov­ern­ing the use of the terms ‘free range’ or ‘bred free range’, David Jones is fully com­pli­ant with its legal oblig­a­tions. This is a mat­ter for the regulators.’

Yes, it is a mat­ter for the reg­u­la­tors, but it is also a mat­ter for brand own­ers who wish build their brand equity on a foun­da­tion of integrity. We cer­tainly have a long way to go, and we don’t seem to be get­ting any closer. As I have said pre­vi­ously both the con­sumer and the true organic and free range pro­duc­ers are the big losers.

Peter Singline
Brand Scientist

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Brand Claims — When Pigs Fly”

  1. david says:

    Inter­est­ing post Pete. If these organic food brands are built on authen­tic­ity — then authen­tic­ity require absolute trust. If you can’t trust every brand in the mar­ket, then you can trust any brand.

  2. Sarah says:

    Great post. It is sad to see brands mak­ing claims that mis­lead the con­sumer. These days it feels like the only way to get the truth about where the food has come from and what is in it, is to go to your local farmer’s mar­ket and speak to the grower.

  3. I find it incred­i­ble that such a respected brand intends to mis­lead its tar­get mar­ket and uses the 1960s approach of ‘it’s one for the regulators.’

    No it isn’t. It is one for you, as the brand owner. Con­sumers are sim­ply going to assume they are lied to in all com­mu­ni­ca­tions and will stop believ­ing any­thing the brand tells them. Even­tu­ally, they’ll move on to a competitor.

  4. david says:

    I agree Mar­cus, In fact, integrity flows across brands in a seg­ment. The down-side of brands who mis­lead con­sumers is felt across all the brands in a mar­ket such as organic/farm-fed produce.

Leave a Reply