Keep­ing Your Brand Promises
The BP oil dis­as­ter has now been spew­ing oil since April 20th. It is a dis­as­ter of epic pro­por­tions. One won­ders what will hap­pen to BP. Its share price is down, the pipe still not repaired and it seems like the clean up is an impos­si­ble task. The images and videos that have been cir­cu­lated the inter­net are both heart wrench­ing and frus­trat­ing.

Big brands are often seen as invin­ci­ble, but all brands need to look after them­selves, build­ing amaz­ing brands more than win­dow dress­ing, it is about cre­at­ing a phi­los­o­phy and liv­ing it. BP’s cur­rent brand­mark was devel­oped in 2000, to sym­bol­ise a com­mit­ment to a greener future and they haven’t lived up their brand promise, and it effects all of us.

Activism can hap­pens in many ways and design­ers are global cit­i­zens too, and the spill cuts deep. Images can be pow­er­ful and evoca­tive, mean­ings can be skewed and shifted and being cre­ative can be sooth­ing to the soul. A global re-design of the BP logo has been started by Logo My Way, uses can sub­mit a new brand­mark for BP based on recent events. Here is a col­lec­tion of thoughts and feel­ings from around the globe in image from.

Lach­lan McDougall

Designer/Global Cit­i­zen.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “BP Re-design — Practice what you Preach”

  1. david says:

    Inter­est­ing Blog Lach­lan, These re-branded marks cre­ate a very graphic face for global unease at this envi­ron­men­tal dis­as­ter. There are few exam­ples of a brand dis­as­ter so directly under­min­ing the posi­tion­ing of a brand’s identity.

  2. Paul Gray says:

    I think some­thing that’s becom­ing clearer with all this is the dis­tinc­tion between what a brand ‘says’ and what the brand ‘does’. Hence the play on BP as stand­ing for “Bro­ken Promises”.

    While BP did make very pub­lic steps towards repo­si­tion­ing itself as a for­ward think­ing, alter­nate energy, sus­tain­able com­pany the real­ity is that the over­whelm­ing major­ity of its invest­ments in and rev­enues from energy pro­duc­tion are from old/dirty sources as is explained in their most recent annual report — http://www.bp.com/assets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/set_branch/STAGING/common_assets/downloads/pdf/BP_Annual_Review_2009.pdf

    It seems that the new CEO and man­age­ment team have been less inter­ested in the good cor­po­rate cit­i­zen approach — other than to main­tain the lip ser­vice. Alarm­ingly, that last annual report also goes on and on about how impor­tant safety is. I’d hate to be the copy­writer try­ing to put a spin on that in the 2010 report!

    Maybe this is an oppor­tu­nity for BP to show some of the lead­er­ship it seemed to show 10 or so years back and make a com­mit­ment to a more hon­est approach and to push sus­tain­abil­ity fur­ther up the agenda. If it leads this charge it will likely get the sup­port of oth­ers and it may inspire more cau­tious and tra­di­tional com­peti­tors (Exxon/Shell etc) to also step up.

  3. Domma says:

    Some pretty full-on brand­marks there Lachie and loved check­ing out the Logo My Way website!

Leave a Reply