When I was a kid my mother used to buy the cheap­est pri­vate label corn­flakes she could find and serve them up as the real ‘Kel­logg’ thing by putting them in non­de­script plas­tic cereal containers. Even as a kid I knew I was being served an infe­rior prod­uct — and if I had any doubt, break­ing a tooth on the gritty, over­cooked grain con­firmed the switch. I swore when I grew up that I would never betray my favourite brands for a few cents, my fam­ily would never eat infe­rior brands.

It’s a promise I kept for many years. Then the GFC hit and I fell under the spell of the pri­vate label. Guess what, no gritty bits. In fact accept­able qual­ity and lower cost — the per­fect part­ners. Very quickly sav­ing money became a weekly goal and its achieve­ment deliv­ered  huge sat­is­fac­tion in its own right.

It seems I was not alone.

My thanks go to the folks at Aus­tralian Food News arti­cle and a recent report from Data­mon­i­tor research that shows my sav­ings addic­tion is in fact an epi­demic. In the research at least 1/3 of Aus­tralians reported buy­ing pri­vate label prod­ucts to save money either ‘most of the time’ or all of the time over the past year, peak­ing at 44% in May 2010. Added to that the sur­vey found that many Aus­tralian con­sumers believe pri­vate label brands are com­pa­ra­ble to well known brands in terms of qual­ity (50% for clean­ing prod­ucts for example).

As well as strik­ing a chord with me as a con­sumer this trend also res­onates in my pro­fes­sional life. If the con­sumer (god that’s me) is being bewitched by price and sat­is­fied by the qual­ity they receive from pri­vate label,  brands need to act now to reverse the trend. Com­pet­ing on price may be a short term fix but in the long term is unlikely to be sus­tain­able. As an addict I can tell them they’ll need to have do some work to win me back.

A start­ing point is to go back to basics and revisit the brand from the roots up. Have a go at redefin­ing the brand for the new world eco­nomic con­di­tions, is the brand sto­ry­telling still attract­ing the con­sumer, is the brand voice still con­tem­po­rary and attrac­tive, is the brand design doing every­thing it can, does the value propo­si­tion still have appeal.

Truly Deeply is a Brand Agency that works with numer­ous brands, to deliver brand strat­egy and brand design, with the objec­tive of dif­fer­en­ti­at­ing those brands from com­peti­tors, both pri­vate label and branded com­peti­tors. If you’re feel­ing like you need to take a good look at your brand to bet­ter pro­tect it against pri­vate label why not give us a call.

Mal­colm Har­vey
Brand Sav­iour and sav­ings addict.

7 Responses to “Private label and the savings addiction…”

  1. david says:

    Inter­est­ing arti­cle Mal. I’ve been watch­ing the advance of pri­vate label in Aus­tralia in com­par­i­son to it’s quite dif­fer­ent rel­a­tives in Europe. The Euro­pean model is based on a new prod­uct devel­op­ment, pack­ag­ing design, cat­e­gory inno­va­tion mind-set, where-as the pri­vate label indus­try ion Aus­tralia is dom­i­nated by a ‘mimic the mar­ket leader’ men­tal­ity. Even the pack­ag­ing design for one of the big two super­mar­ket pri­vate labels is a direct steal from the Tesco pri­vate label brand iden­tity sys­tem. One model gives the cus­tomer more, the other costs the cus­tomer less. As a brand com­mu­ni­ca­tions designer I con­stantly strug­gle to under­stand what is dri­ving the Aus­tralian approach when the Euro­pean model seems to offer so much more value to cus­tomers and the retailers.

  2. malcolm says:

    Thanks David — inter­est­ingly in the UK Sains­bury had a habit 20 years ago of copy­ing the leader.
    I think the Euro­pean model as you describe it is a much more con­sid­ered approach designed to cre­ate brands with their own attrib­utes and per­son­al­i­ties — poten­tially even more dif­fi­cult for exist­ing brands to counter.

  3. Ylva says:

    It’s inter­est­ing, from a purely brand design per­spec­tive, that in the UK, and increas­ingly in Swe­den (surely in other Euro­pean coun­tries as well, but those are the ones I keep track of), pri­vate label prod­ucts look more mod­ern and styl­ish than “Brand” brands.

  4. Malcolm says:

    Ylva,

    Fight­ing brands at a level above mim­ic­k­ing is a far more sophis­ti­cated approach — and of course the pri­vate label brands have the advan­tage that they con­trol the shelves in the retail outlet.

  5. Domma says:

    Great blog Mal and love the packaging!

  6. JustinaGudelyte says:

    Hi Mal­colm!
    Great arti­cle! I have thought about this rev­o­lu­tion some­where in the back of my mind as well!
    I agree that pri­vate labels do not rep­re­sent infe­rior prod­ucts any longer. Pri­vate labels have become brands on their own, chal­leng­ing the assump­tion that they must con­tain infe­rior prod­ucts, have ter­ri­ble pack­ag­ing, etc. In Swe­den, pri­vate label brands are quite advanced I would say. Some of them are even eco­log­i­cal. I think it’s great!

  7. drew says:

    love the post! i feel like we live in the same house hold! great choice of pack­age designs to illustrate.

Leave a Reply